Arrest for a DUI in Arizona?

"Now that you've come into contact with the law, you've found out the dirty little secret. Anyone drinking and driving is subject to arrest, whether or not it was affecting their driving ability. But being arrested does not mean you will be convicted."

Arizona-DUI.com Rss

Think you can talk yourself out of a DUI???? Think again.

Posted by Attorney Theodore Agnick | Posted in DUI Penalty Info | Posted on 02-01-2009

Charles Barkley DUI

Charles Barkley DUI

Charles Barkley was stopped and arrested for DUI on December 31, 2008, in the City of Scottsdale, at 1:26 A.M.,  according to police.  The cop that stopped Charles Barkley was from the Gilbert Police Department and working in Scottsdale as part of a DUI Task Force.

Charles Barkley was stopped because he rolled through a stop sign.  After allegedly rolling through the stop sign, Charles Barkley stopped to pick up a female passenger.  Shortly after driving off with the passenger, the cop made a traffic stop on Charles Barkley’s vehicle. 

Upon contacting the driver, the cop noticed the infamous, “bloodshot watery eyes” and “odor of alcohol” on his breath.  The cop asked Charles Barkley if he had been drinking.  According to the police report, Mr. Barkley admitted to having a “couple” of drinks. 

NOTE: this answer is frequently given by people that are stopped and arrested for DUI.  If you say you have had a “few” or a “couple” of drinks, don’t expect the cop to believe you.  In addition to giving one of the worst answer you could possibly give, Charles Barkley then agreed to submit to field “sobriety” tests.  These are subjective tests that typically are not given correctly by officers.  According to the police report, the cop indicated he arrested Charles Barkley for DUI because of the odor of alcohol on his breath, his blood-shot, watery, eyes, his driving, and the results of the field “sobriety” tests. 

Charles Barkley did refuse to submit to the portable breath test.  According to the police report, Charles Barkley told the cop that his body guard was a police officer and tole him not to take that test.  Too bad his body guard wasn’t a lawyer, because a lawyer would have told him not to do the field sobriety tests either and  to never admit drinking. 

Once Charles Barkley was arrested, nothing he said from that point on could have helped him.  At the police station, Charles Barkley made some statements explaining why his was in a hurry.  You can view the police report for your own entertainment regarding these statements. 

According to the report, he even offered to tattoo his name on the buttocks of one of Gilbert PD’s civilian employees.  After being processed for DUI, Charles Barkley was later released to a taxi.  According to the cop that arrested him, Charles Barkley was cordial and respectful.

Charles Barkley’s DUI case, as well as Paris Hilton’s and Heather Locklear’s cases, should remind everyone that it is extremely unlikely you can talk your way out of a DUI.  It is more likely that you can beat your DUI, if you don’t admit to any drinking and refuse the “sobriety” tests.  The only test you need to take, is the breath or blood test that is requested after, not before, you are arrested.  Also, do not lie to the officer’s about your drinking history.  Simply tell them that you don’t want to answer that question, because your lawyer friend told you never to answer that question.  Blame it all on “that jerk lawyer” and be polite.  Remember, if these high powered celebrities can’t talk themselves out of a DUI, what chance do you have.  For more Arizona DUI information visit www.480NotGuilty.com.

Arizona Misdemeanor DUI Alcohol Laws

Posted by Attorney Theodore Agnick | Posted in Misdemeanor DUI | Posted on 30-12-2008

DUI

DUI

If you’re arrested for violating Arizona’s DUI Alcohol laws, it might be helpful to know what the DUI law says to show what you’re up against. And why you might need a DUI defense lawyer to help you with defense case.

You see, Arizona doesn’t like DUI drivers.

In fact, Arizona has three basic laws prohibiting drinking with illegal amounts of alcohol in your system. These are:

§28-1381(a)(1): It is a misdemeanor to drive under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.

§28-1381(a)(2): It is a misdemeanor to have a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or more within two hours of operating a motor vehicle.

§28-1382(a): It is a misdemeanor to have a BAC of .15 or more within two hours of operating a motor vehicle.

In most cases, both the §28-1381(a) offenses will be charged. This will result where you are cited for DUI and your reading is above a .08 but below a .15.

Even though there is only one act, the law says a citizen can be charged and convicted of both offenses. However, the law says you can only be punished once for the offenses,(the punishments are identical).

To convict you of violating §28-1381(a)(1) the prosecutor must show you were operating a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol. To convict you of violating §28-1381(a)(2) the prosecutor must show you were operating with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or more within two hours of operating a motor vehicle.

The police can still cite you and the prosecutor can still convict you for violating §28-1381(a)(1), operating a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol even if your reading is under a .08.

Thus, if the police think you are under the influence but below a .08, they can still prosecute you for DUI.

If your reading is above .15, then the police will cite you with three charges; they are §28-1381(a)(1), §28-1381(a)(2), and §28-1382(a).

To do this, in Section §28-1381(a)(2) the prosecutor must show you were operating with a blood alcohol concentration of .15 or more within two hours of operating a motor vehicle.

If they prove this, it follows they would be able to convict you for having a BAC of .08 or more.

Also, if a jury or judge believes you had a BAC of .15 or more, they would convict you of driving under the influence. The penalties for this offense are more severe than the penalties for the §28-1381(a) charges.

I’ll explain all of this to you during your free consultation. Just call me at 602-453-3100 today to schedule your consultation.

Arizona Misdemeanor DUI Drug Laws

Posted by Attorney Theodore Agnick | Posted in Misdemeanor DUI | Posted on 15-01-2007

Arizona DUI

Arizona DUI

Not only does Arizona have laws against drunk driving (driving under the influence), the State also has DUI drug laws which mirror the DUI alcohol laws.

Basically, Arizona has two drug laws prohibiting a person from operating a motor vehicle with drugs in their system. These are:
§28-1381(a)(1): It is a misdemeanor to drive under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.
§28-1381(a)(3): It is a misdemeanor to drive with the metabolite of a illicit drug in your system.
In most cases, both the §28-1381(a)(1) and §28-1381(a)(3) offenses will be charged.
This will happen where you are cited for DUI and the police suspect you have an illicit drug in your system. As a general rule, the police will only cite a person under Arizona’s DUI drugs law if they believe the person has the metabolite of an illicit drug in their system.
The §28-1381(a)(3) charge only requires the police to show you have the metabolite of an illicit drug in your body.
This charge does not require the police to establish you were under the influence of the drug.
Thus, if a person smoked marijuana twenty days ago and the metabolite is still in their system, the person can be convicted of violating this law.
In fact, even if the person has non-illicit prescription or over the counter drugs in their system, the police can charge a person for violating §28-1381(a)(1).
In order to properly issue the citation, the police must have probable cause to believe the drug in your system is impairing your ability to drive to the slightest degree.
It is very uncommon for the police to charge a person in this situation unless they believe the person overdosed on their prescription or over the counter medication and they cannot safely operate a motor vehicle as a result.
The penalties are similar for a DUI alcohol charge. However, a conviction for DUI drugs normally results in loss of your driver’s license for one year whereas a conviction for DUI Alcohol normally results in a 90 day loss of your license. Also, you can only be penalized once even if you are convicted of both the §28-1381(a)(1) and §28-1381(a)(3) charges.

What Do I Have to Do If this Is My Second or Third Dui Arrest in 7 Years?

Posted by Attorney Theodore Agnick | Posted in DUI Penalty Info | Posted on 04-01-2007

Arizoan DUI Arrest

Arizoan DUI Arrest

The penalties for a second or third Arizona DUI arrest are so severe you need to contract an attorney immediately.

Specifically, these type of offenses involve license suspensions from one to three years . . . there are no restricted driving privileges . . . and second and third DUI offenses involve significant jail time.

Here’s what you need to know.

If you are convicted of a second DUI in Arizona within 7 years of your first offense, the absolute minimum jail sentence you can receive is 90 days in jail, of which 60 can be suspended.

If your second DUI offense within seven years is extreme DUI, the minimum jail sentence you can receive is 120 days. The maximum jail sentence for second offense regular or extreme DUI is 6 months in jail.

A third Arizona DUI conviction in five years is a class 4 felony. If you have no allegeable prior felony convictions, the presumptive prison sentence you can receive is 2.5 years. However, you may receive probation, in which case, the minimum incarceration time you must serve is 4 months in prison.

There are other penalties that will affect you in addition to those mentioned above. If you are in this situation, it should be obvious to you that you need an attorney. The smartest thing you can do is hire an attorney who is familiar with DUI Law.